The value of Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Prenatal Placental Implantation
Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine Research DOI: 10.32629/jcmr.v6i1.3681
Abstract
This study aims to explore the application value of magnetic resonance rapid imaging technology in the diagnosis of prenatal placenta implantation. Methods: Sixty-three patients with suspected prenatal placenta implantation were selected from January 2022 to January 2023 in our hospital and diagnosed with MRI rapid imaging sequences, and the diagnostic results, efficacy and common signs of MRI were counted. Results: Pathological diagnosis showed prenatal placenta implantation in 50 cases and MRI diagnosis in 49 cases. Using pathology as a criterion, MRI diagnosis had a sensitivity of 98.00%, a specificity of 100.00%, a positive predictive value of 100.00%, a negative predictive value of 92.86%, and an accuracy of 98.41%. MRI signs differed significantly between different grades of placental implantation, and patients with high-grade placental implantation had more comorbid signs, with lower uterine bulge, protruding uterine contour, and tenting signs as high-risk signs. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance rapid imaging has high accuracy and application value in the diagnosis of prenatal placenta implantation, which can guide clinical treatment. This article will discuss the value of magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of prenatal placenta implantation to promote better understanding and application of this examination method.
Keywords
magnetic resonance technology application; signs; prenatal placenta; implantation diagnosis; diagnostic value
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Chen FY. The application value of non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of placental implantation and exploration of scanning protocol[J]. Guangxi Medicine, 2022,37(11):173-176.
[2] Wang Lianyun, Xie Ailan, Chen Wei, et al. The value of prenatal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance examination in the diagnosis of placenta implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medical Imaging, 2022,26(7):55-56.
[3] Zhou JH. Analysis of the application effect of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in the diagnosis of aggressive placenta praevia combined with placenta implantation[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Application, 2022,5(22):154-155.
[4] Liu Yumei. The value of applying magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of antepartum placental implantation in middle and late pregnancy[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 2022,5(23):224-225.
[5] Xuanjing Liang. Application value of magnetic resonance sequence combination in the diagnosis of abnormal placenta and umbilical vessel position[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2021,32(1):170-172.
[6] Kong Lijun. Evaluation of the accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta implantation[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2021,37(2):238-240.
[7] Li Xiaofan. Application of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and analysis of imaging performance[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Application, 2021,3(15):74-76.
[2] Wang Lianyun, Xie Ailan, Chen Wei, et al. The value of prenatal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance examination in the diagnosis of placenta implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medical Imaging, 2022,26(7):55-56.
[3] Zhou JH. Analysis of the application effect of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in the diagnosis of aggressive placenta praevia combined with placenta implantation[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Application, 2022,5(22):154-155.
[4] Liu Yumei. The value of applying magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of antepartum placental implantation in middle and late pregnancy[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 2022,5(23):224-225.
[5] Xuanjing Liang. Application value of magnetic resonance sequence combination in the diagnosis of abnormal placenta and umbilical vessel position[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2021,32(1):170-172.
[6] Kong Lijun. Evaluation of the accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta implantation[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2021,37(2):238-240.
[7] Li Xiaofan. Application of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and analysis of imaging performance[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Application, 2021,3(15):74-76.
Copyright © 2025 Lingyan Zhang, Qianjing Dong

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License