Measurement of Ecosystem Service Value in the Yellow River Basin under the Background of High-quality Development
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v5i1.1591
Abstract
As a critical ecological security barrier in China, the Yellow River Basin plays a pivotal role in delivering indispensable ecosystem services. Analyzing the ecosystem services' value in the Yellow River Basin is vital for enhancing ecological protection awareness and advancing ecological initiatives. This study delineates the spatiotemporal characteristics of the Yellow River Basin's ecosystem service value from 2010 to 2021, employing land use change and equivalent factor methods. The findings demonstrate a substantial increase in the Yellow River Basin's ecosystem service value from 2010 to 2021, exhibiting a spatial distribution of lower values centrally and higher values peripherally, a discrepancy that is progressively diminishing. Aquatic ecosystem services exhibited the highest value, succeeded by wetlands, forests, and other categories. Furthermore, our results emphasize the comprehensive spatiotemporal role of ecosystem service value in the Yellow River Basin, offering a theoretical framework and reference for policymakers in evaluating the ecological safety of barrier areas.
Keywords
high-quality development, ecosystem services valuation, Yellow River basin ecology
Funding
2022 Yellow River Basin High-Quality Economic Development Research Base Project (22HYJ36); Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics 2023 Graduate Research Innovation Project (NCYX2023020)
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesIndexation
Download Index RecordReferences
[1]Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260.
[2]Costanza, Robert, et al. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152-158.
[3]Ouyang Z, Song C, Zheng H, et al. 2020. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25): 14593-14601.
[4]Ye, Yanqiong, et al. 2021. Changes in land-use and ecosystem service value in Guangdong province, southern China, from 1990 to 2018. Land, 10(4): 426.
[5]Cao, Yanni, et al. 2021. The balance between economic development and ecosystem service value in the process of land urbanization: A case study of China’s land urbanization from 2000 to 2015. Land Use Policy, 108: 105536.
[6]Lu Y, Liu Y, He H, et al. 2022. Diagnosing degradation risks of ecosystem services in Wuhan, China from the perspective of land development: Identification, measurement and regulation. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108580.
[7]Raihan, Asif. 2023. A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(3): 1-18.
[8]Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Cheng Shengkui. 2001. Research progress on the valuation of global ecosystem services. Resources Science, (06): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[9]Tang Xiaoling, Du Li. 2020. Research on the coupling coordination of regional economic development and ecological environment based on the gravity model: A case study of Shaanxi Province. Ecological Economics, 36(07): 164-169. (in Chinese)
[10]Liu Gengyuan, Yang Qing, Huang Junyong. 2020. Study on the characteristics of ecosystem service value changes and influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin in the past fifteen years. China Environmental Management, 12(03): 90-97. (in Chinese)
[11]Liu Shan. 2021. The impact of urbanization process in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2000 to 2014 on the ecosystem service value. Dissertation, Northwest A&F University. (in Chinese)
[12]Liu Jie, Zhang Huaquan. 2021. Research on the coupling of ecological capital and high-quality economic development in the Yellow River Basin. Rural Finance Research, (09): 31-41. (in Chinese)
[13]Fan Cunhui. 2021. Research on the ecological compensation transfer payment system in the Yellow River Basin. Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences. (in Chinese)
[14]Yang Wenzhao. 2022. Research on the coupling relationship between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Dissertation, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics. (in Chinese)
[15]Wei Jiahao, Wen Yuling, Gong Zhijun, et al. 2022. Changes in land use and ecosystem service value in the buffer zone of Poyang Lake in the past 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(22): 9261-9273. (in Chinese)
[16]Wei Xiaojian, Zhao Li, Cheng Penggen, Xie Yajuan, Wang Huimin. 2022. Spatial dynamics of land use and ecosystem service value in China: A case study of prefecture-level and above cities. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 29(04): 370-376. (in Chinese)
[17]Chen Xiaobo, Lin Xiaosong, Mu Fengyun, et al. 2023. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem service value and topographic gradient effect in northeastern Chongqing. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science), 42(04): 92-102. (in Chinese)
[18]He Zhixue, Wang Lei, Luo Jun, et al. 2023. Spatiotemporal effects of land use changes and ecosystem service value in Yibin City in the past 20 years. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sciences), 44(04): 350-357. (in Chinese)
[19]Zhang Jingyang. 2023. Inner Mongolia announces the top ten scientific and technological breakthroughs in the region for 2022. Science Daily, 2023-01-13(007). (in Chinese)
[20]Jia Hongwen, Fan Shugang. 2023. Research on the coupling coordination of green finance and high-quality economic development in the Yellow River Basin. Ecological Economics, 39(10): 89-98. (in Chinese)
[2]Costanza, Robert, et al. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152-158.
[3]Ouyang Z, Song C, Zheng H, et al. 2020. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25): 14593-14601.
[4]Ye, Yanqiong, et al. 2021. Changes in land-use and ecosystem service value in Guangdong province, southern China, from 1990 to 2018. Land, 10(4): 426.
[5]Cao, Yanni, et al. 2021. The balance between economic development and ecosystem service value in the process of land urbanization: A case study of China’s land urbanization from 2000 to 2015. Land Use Policy, 108: 105536.
[6]Lu Y, Liu Y, He H, et al. 2022. Diagnosing degradation risks of ecosystem services in Wuhan, China from the perspective of land development: Identification, measurement and regulation. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108580.
[7]Raihan, Asif. 2023. A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(3): 1-18.
[8]Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Cheng Shengkui. 2001. Research progress on the valuation of global ecosystem services. Resources Science, (06): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[9]Tang Xiaoling, Du Li. 2020. Research on the coupling coordination of regional economic development and ecological environment based on the gravity model: A case study of Shaanxi Province. Ecological Economics, 36(07): 164-169. (in Chinese)
[10]Liu Gengyuan, Yang Qing, Huang Junyong. 2020. Study on the characteristics of ecosystem service value changes and influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin in the past fifteen years. China Environmental Management, 12(03): 90-97. (in Chinese)
[11]Liu Shan. 2021. The impact of urbanization process in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2000 to 2014 on the ecosystem service value. Dissertation, Northwest A&F University. (in Chinese)
[12]Liu Jie, Zhang Huaquan. 2021. Research on the coupling of ecological capital and high-quality economic development in the Yellow River Basin. Rural Finance Research, (09): 31-41. (in Chinese)
[13]Fan Cunhui. 2021. Research on the ecological compensation transfer payment system in the Yellow River Basin. Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences. (in Chinese)
[14]Yang Wenzhao. 2022. Research on the coupling relationship between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Dissertation, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics. (in Chinese)
[15]Wei Jiahao, Wen Yuling, Gong Zhijun, et al. 2022. Changes in land use and ecosystem service value in the buffer zone of Poyang Lake in the past 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(22): 9261-9273. (in Chinese)
[16]Wei Xiaojian, Zhao Li, Cheng Penggen, Xie Yajuan, Wang Huimin. 2022. Spatial dynamics of land use and ecosystem service value in China: A case study of prefecture-level and above cities. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 29(04): 370-376. (in Chinese)
[17]Chen Xiaobo, Lin Xiaosong, Mu Fengyun, et al. 2023. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem service value and topographic gradient effect in northeastern Chongqing. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science), 42(04): 92-102. (in Chinese)
[18]He Zhixue, Wang Lei, Luo Jun, et al. 2023. Spatiotemporal effects of land use changes and ecosystem service value in Yibin City in the past 20 years. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sciences), 44(04): 350-357. (in Chinese)
[19]Zhang Jingyang. 2023. Inner Mongolia announces the top ten scientific and technological breakthroughs in the region for 2022. Science Daily, 2023-01-13(007). (in Chinese)
[20]Jia Hongwen, Fan Shugang. 2023. Research on the coupling coordination of green finance and high-quality economic development in the Yellow River Basin. Ecological Economics, 39(10): 89-98. (in Chinese)
Copyright © 2024 Yuanxiu Tang, Enze Li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License