Comparison of active and passive voice in English-Chinese translation--taking the example of Howard Goldblatt's translation of Rickshaw Boy

Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i1.1588

Ziyan PENG

School of Foreign Languages, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Abstract

In the translation between English and Chinese, there are significant differences in sentence structure, grammatical features, rhetorical devices, expression methods, ways of thinking, and social and cultural factors between the two languages, which increase the difficulty of translation. Especially in English-Chinese translation, the similarities and differences in the usage of active and passive voice can easily lead to translation errors. In English, the passive voice is more regarded as a common grammatical phenomenon, while in Chinese, the active expression of passive meaning is more dominant. Taking Howard Goldblatt's translation of Rickshaw Boy as an example, through the analysis of the passive and active voice in English and Chinese languages with different structures, we can learn more about the similarities and differences between the two languages in order to improve the quality of translation.

Keywords

active; passive; comparison between English and Chinese

References

[1] Fu DD. 2022. English Translation of Culturally Loaded Words from the Perspective of Acceptance Aesthetics Theory. Xihua University.
[2] Huang M, Jiang M. 2021. An English translation study of the human body metaphor in Camel Xiangzi from the perspective of conceptual integration theory. Overseas English, 15: 253-254.
[3] Li QW. 2020. A Comparative study of English translations of Camel Xiangzi under the perspective of prospectualisation. Overseas English, 15: 177-178.
[4] Li Y. 2018. Comparison of the differences in the use of person and object subjects in Chinese-English sentence translation--taking the Chinese version of Pride and Prejudice and the English translation of Camel Xiangzi as an example. Journal of Yueyang Vocational and Technical College, 4: 83-86.
[5] Sun Q. 2018. A comparative analysis of English-Chinese translated excerpts from Camel Xiangzi. Modern Communication, 16: 72-73.
[6] Yang DF. 2022. Rickshaw Boy: the tragic fate of enlightenment. Literary Education (in), 9: 27-29.
[7] Zhang XY. 2019. Comparative differences in English-Chinese sentence translation from the active and passive perspectives--taking Ge Haowen's translation of Camel Xiangzi and Shi Xiaojing's translation as an example. Modern Commerce Industry, 35: 180-181.
[8] Zhang Y, Wu Y, Hu J. 2019. Comparative differences in English-Chinese sentence translation from the perspective of person and object--taking the translation of Camel Xiangzi by Ge Haowen and the translation of Shi Xiaojing as an example. English Square, 9: 7-8.

Copyright © 2024 Ziyan PENG

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License