Contextual panel conditioning and reward models in large language models

Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i1.1619

Muyuan WEN

GPT DESK PTE LTD

Abstract

Direct preference optimization (DPO) aims to match human preferences while reducing the complexity of reinforcement learning. Traditional methods such as reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) first match reward models with cues and preferences, and then use reinforcement learning (RL) to find policies that maximize rewards. In contrast, DPO simplifies the process by directly optimizing the policy to satisfy preferences without explicit reward functions or RL processes. DPO is a more direct and potentially more efficient way to fine-tune a language model to remain consistent with human feedback. Additionally, OpenAI mentioned that they trained the model by imitating human ratings to help improve RLHF. The next step is to fit the model to a data set containing rich "conditions". For example, the training model generates a panel containing memories, conditions, goals, plans, and future tasks, and uses this panel for training. These conditions transform the "creative writing task" into the task of "distributing materials", reducing entropy in creative writing. Conditional reinforcement learning fine-tuning (C-RLFT) enables large language models to understand and generate human-like text, adapt to new information, and personalize responses while maintaining relevance and coherence. Future improvements include improving conditional panels using RLHF or RLAIF, iteration between datasets and models, aligning models with real-world needs, and building new base models based on 0-order optimization. These directions aim to make large language models more efficient, consistent with human preferences, and able to run in a variety of environments, including edge computing devices. Hello, here is some text without a meaning. This text should show what a printed text will look like at this place. If you read this text, you will get no information. Really? Is there no information? Is there a difference between this text and some nonsense like "Huardest gefburn"? Kjift – not at all! A blind text like this gives you information about the selected font, how the letters are written and an impression of the look. This text should contain all letters of the alphabet and it should be written in the original language. There is no need for special content, but the length of words should match the language.

Keywords

direct preference optimization; human feedback reinforcement learning; conditional panel; creative writing entropy reduction; c-RLFT training; edge computing

References

[1] Eduardo GA, Giampaolo C, Mirko DE. 2012. On the origin of long range correlations in texts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(29): 11582-11587.
[2] Gehman S, Gururangan S, Sap M, Choi Y, Smith NA. 2020. Real toxicity prompts: evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models. In findings of the association for computational linguistics: EMNLP2020, 3356-3369, Association for Computational Linguistics. doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.11462
[3] Jared K, Sam MC, Tom H, Tom B, Benjamin C, Rewon C, Scott G, Alec R, Jeffrey W, Dario A. "Scaling laws for neural language models". ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2001.08361

Copyright © 2024 Muyuan WEN

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License